When two tribes go to war

January 21st, 2012

This promotional video of the Frankie Goes to Hollywood song, Two Tribes, imagines the, then current, leaders of America and Russia slugging it out in a dusty ring. After I saw it, this ‘joke’ resonated with me for a long time as a dream of extreme democracy.

Here’s the dream.

If the leader of any country in the world had a particular beef with the leader from another country then instead of the usual stupidity of declaring war on the other country, they would be obliged to resolve the dispute personally in unarmed combat.

The fight would take place in a cage measuring fifteen feet by fifteen feet and the combatants would be completely naked. The bout would be televised and the full reality of war in all its disgusting, biting, scratching, hair-pulling, bloody depravity, would be visible for all to see. The winner of the contest (either a fight to the death or until one cried submission) would be deemed to have won the war and the people of the losing side would be obliged to give up their oil, nuclear weapons, terrorist activities or whatever.

Of course, if the people objected to losing the war, they could always refuse to participate and instead, put up memorials to their fallen leaders and have special commemorative days to celebrate their futile but honourable sacrifice for their overtly territorial and political ambitions. Then the people would carry on as normal.

Any elected leader of any country in the world would be obliged to abide by this convention, which would be enforced ruthlessly by the people of that country. Failure to abide by the convention would result in the leader being sent white feathers through the post by anonymous senders before they were humiliated in court and eventually imprisoned.

Imagine for a moment how such a reality would affect politics.

Firstly, you would deter the worst possible people who had the worst possible motives for wanting power. Secondly, the leaders of any country would have to be sure of their fitness, both in their physical condition and in their ability to think rationally. All political posturing in their rhetoric would have to be carefully considered in case their bluff is called and they are required to back up their words with physical force. You would end up with either a giant for a leader or a philosopher.

Either way, it’s got to be better than the system we have today.

The Wizard of Oz

December 26th, 2011

Never having seen the classic film, The Wizard of Oz I attempted to watch it the other day. The attempt failed. From the outset I was disappointed by what I saw. The film begins in a monochrome sepia tint, it’s shot in 4:3 aspect ratio and uses obvious studio sets in its scenes. The film image quality when compared to HD television is unacceptable and the sound quality recording of the film is only just acceptable. Admittedly, the film bursts into colour after twenty minutes or so but the effect is lurid rather than sensational. And, when all is said and done, it is a children’s film.

No doubt the film was sensational in its day and represented cutting edge technologically in film-making terms. Unfortunately, time is not kind to such boasts and they only carry weight when the film is considered as a historical artifact and not as a work of art in itself. Viewing the film becomes a history lesson then, rather than an enjoyable experience in itself.

The Wizard of Oz is supposed to be a compelling story though, a timeless classic. It might be in print but the improvement in the mechanics of film making over the decades has acted as a barrier to the enjoyment of the story. And such is the young age of the art form that camera techniques and editing styles are still being developed and therefore subject to fashion. And with new media competing for cinema audiences, how much of film-making technique is geared towards instant gratification rather than considered exploration of the subject matter? You only need to look at what is happening in the music industry to see the temptation.

The most successful children’s stories are as equally as compelling for adults. Indeed, the success of any story is determined by its relevance to as many demographics and to as many cultures as possible.

Some stories would be universal and timeless in film but the delivery of the story is not. Technical issues interfere with the connection between the storyteller and the recipient. This is why the written word (and by extension, theatre) is still the best medium for telling a story; the images remain as sharp and the voices as distinct as our own imagination (or eyesight) allows.

Those Bettakultcha story tellers, they just make it up as they go along…

December 23rd, 2011
Christmas BettaKultcha 2011. Quality.

Christmas BettaKultcha 2011. Quality.

In the colorful history of Bettakultcha, two pivotal moments have occurred  which have polarised the audience. The first happened a few months ago when a controversial film was shown during the interval. In that instance, Bettakultcha emerged bigger and stronger. The second moment has yet to reach a defining conclusion.

Here is the story of the second incident.

At the Christmas Bettakultcha event in the Corn Exchange, Martin Carter, a drag artist,  did a presentation which involved miming to a musical track about vegemite. Martin displayed images and lyrics on his slides and performed in flamboyant burlesque style. The result was hilariously entertaining. I remember thinking, ‘I wouldn’t like to follow that presentation’.

As it happened, the acts that followed Martin were more than capable of holding their own and the evening finished on a massive high.

So what’s the problem? Well, it appears that afterwards in various hostelries around the Corn Exchange, the audience discussed this performance and divided themselves into two distinct camps. On the one side was the traditionalists who argued that miming was, cheating and shouldn’t be allowed at the event. The other side argued that the event was more of a cabaret and shouldn’t be restricted by simple rules about speaking. It was also related to me in despatches (I was not present in the pub but unglamorously de-rigging and tidying up in the Corn Exchange despite my boast to the audience earlier in the evening that after the show I was going to go to a sex and cocaine party thrown by the Krankies) that some people actually thought that the Random Slide Challenge should be dropped!

Here are my thoughts on the matter.

When I started Bettakultcha with Richard Michie I used to joke to the audience that we were making it up as we went along. Except I wasn’t joking. We really were making it up. If something worked we kept it for the next event, if it didn’t, it was dropped. The fact that the concept was based on talking presentations didn’t limit the potential creativity; talking presentations was just the start. In fact the template of twenty slides lasting fifteen seconds each is just a good way of creating a start point for people who might otherwise be overwhelmed when faced with the entire world to explore. The possibilities for innovation with this format are endless, five minute plays could be written, rap songs performed, comedy sketches… we just needed the adventurous people to explore them.

Most people stick to the tried and tested formula of talking over twenty slides. I have no problem with this. If their idea or passion is strong enough, then the template works every time. However, when someone attempts an innovative variation on the template, I rejoice; creativity, originality and innovation is what will set Bettakultcha apart from all the other speaking events that currently exist—it should be encouraged.

So I was amazed that some people actually wanted to halt the development of Bettakultcha at a particular stage in its evolution (sure, we’re running strongly now but imagine if we could fly too). How could anyone imagine that Martin was cheating? Let’s look at the Bettakultcha rules again;

Did he use twenty slides?
Yes.

Did they last fifteen seconds each?
Yes.

Did he do a sales pitch?
Erm, he did mention vegemite but in a negative way, so, no.

No cheating there then.

But I can see the objection raised by the people in the pub. If you allow miming, what’s to stop someone from just playing their favourite music track, whilst showing pictures of their favourite band and they played air guitar for five minutes.

Nothing*.

We would allow that because anyone who imagines that such an act would entertain the audience is either genuinely good or comedically deluded. Either way, it would be interesting to watch and bound to get a reaction from the Bettakultcha audience.

Oh, I forgot to mention one caveat (which fortunately we haven’t had to exercise yet), if Richard or myself don’t like the way something is being presented, then we pull the plug on them. We’ll use our common sense and intuition for the benefit of all. This approach has worked well so far and as Bettakultcha is a story in the making, we’ll continue to employ the same strategy.

*We wouldn’t be able to post the video of the performance on any internet sites though, because of copyright infringement of the music. Martin’s performance therefore, will have to remain a memory for those who were there on the night.

The technological arms race intensifies on our roads

November 28th, 2011

Driving home from a caricature gig recently, the matrix signs on the motorway informed me that the road would be shut up ahead. As it was still early in the evening I knew it couldn’t be scheduled road works that was causing the road closure, as these generally happen at night, so it had to be an accident of some kind. This meant that it was unlikely that any diversion signs were in place to guide the hapless motorist. As I had SatNav capability, I wasn’t too worried, as I could calculate an alternative route quite easily when I was forced to leave the motorway.

As the traffic approached a junction, the drivers could see that the road up ahead had become a car park and many of them decided to turn off the motorway at the junction, rather than get caught in the queue. I did the same.

When it was safe to do so, I tapped into the SatNav and asked it to find an alternative route. This it did, although it turned out that it wasn’t really necessary to have the SatNav as all the other cars that had turned off the motorway were taking exactly the same route.

I realised, too late, that nearly everyone has SatNav these days and all the devices were going to find the same alternative route to rejoin the motorway at another junction after so many miles of a detour. It was as if the highways agency had actually put diversion signs in place and everyone was slavishly following them.

As we crawled down an A road that was heading into a large town and which was lined with shops I asked my SatNav to find yet another alternative route. Immediately it told me to turn left into a side street then turn right into another side street. This turned out to be a parallel road to the main A road that everyone was queuing in, but was deserted as it was a suburban street and wasn’t even a B road.

I quickly made my way into the town centre down this road that proved quite narrow in places due to the parked cars, but as it was free of moving traffic, I had no problem at all in getting past. Eventually I navigated through the town centre via a different A road, thereby missing all the motorway traffic jamming the obvious A road, and saving myself maybe thirty minutes on my journey time.

So the irony is this; many years ago, when I was one of the few people to have SatNav capability, I could easily escape a motorway queue and rejoin the motorway further along where there was no queue. Now that everyone has SatNav capability, this is no longer possible as everyone escapes the motorway queue, and merely forms another queue on a smaller A road. But I can still easily escape the traffic queue by deploying the technology yet again to second guess where everyone else will be going and asking it to find an alternative route to that route.

How long, I wonder, before others figure this out and create another problem for me to overcome? Will route programers add another option to the menu—’alternative route using the least likely alternative route used by other SatNav owners’?

Northern Art Prize preview, Leeds Art Gallery

November 23rd, 2011
James Hugonin, Binary Rhythm (detail)

James Hugonin, Binary Rhythm (detail)

Leo Fitzmaurice has done something really clever. He has taken old, rarely seen landscape paintings from the archives of the gallery and put them together in such a way as to create an extended horizon line out of them all. It’s a mash-up of representational art, initially put together using digital software, then by physically hanging the paintings. He’s produced a new work out of old works, but what I really like is the fact that all the paintings used are beautiful works in themselves; traditional painting still has a formidable power to move.

James Hugonin is a painter but a non-representational one. His meticulous blocks of colour remind me of those once popular abstract pictures where you had to de-focus your eyes to see a 3D representational image hidden in the colours. No amount of de-focusing on my part was going to reveal any more insight into his works however. I was impressed with the prodigious amount of work needed to create these works. I could almost imagine James feeling the need to do these paintings in a 90 degree heat so that he physically has to sweat as he applies the colours, such is his commitment to his work. I couldn’t make sense of why he has put certain colours where he has though—I felt I was looking at some epidemiological chart that wanted to tell me something if only I could divine the causes for the results. It’s as if he were studying the very DNA of painting itself and he was mapping its genome in a painstaking and methodical process.

Richard Rigg’s work did very little for me. On one wall of the gallery is a negative cast of a coat hook, so the space of the hook is inside the wall. I marvelled at the size of the plaster slab that contained the piece and that formed part of the wall but unfortunate comparisons with Rachel Whiteread and her ‘inside out’ house were inevitable. His craftsmanship however, as evidenced by his chairs, is undeniable.

At the preview it was explained to us that Liadin Cooke suffers from synesthesia, a condition which confuses stimuli in the brain, so sound appears as an image etc. This means that Liadin must inhabit a world that is completely alien to most people and I must confess, her work left me cold (or possibly blue). It’s as if she has made visual art for blind people. The collected oil scrapings from an artists palette, cast in bronze but painted to look like putty, is an artwork. Maybe to someone who has synesthesia, this is sensational. Alas, I don’t, so it isn’t.

A few days in Barcelona

November 4th, 2011

Barca7

When we told people that we were going to spend a few days in Barcelona the most common response was, “Watch out for pickpockets.” We didn’t realise at the time just how important this piece of advice was. We should have paid more attention, in the same way that if we’d said; “We’re going to be sailing the coast of Somalia,” and people replied with,” Watch out for pirates!” or “We’re going to Mexico. To buy drugs,” and people replied with, “Watch out for gang wars!” Because, as it happened we fell victim to the Barcelona thieves on no less than three occasions in the space of four days.

The first attempt was after a visit to Park Güell, a Gaudi inspired wonderland. We were walking down the narrow street that leads from the park to the bus stop a few hundred metres below the park. This is a happy hunting ground for pickpockets because of the density of tourists. It was my wife who felt the zip on her rucksack being pulled. She turned around to face the despicable culprit only to find a young woman, white, middle class, accompanied by a middle aged woman, white, middle class, both well dressed. After challenging them about their activities, their response was to adopt the expressions of shop mannequins. My wife then looked for confirmation of their activities by asking the people immediately adjacent to the thieves if they had seen anything. More shop mannequin expressions followed and my wife then realised that they were all in it together and worked as a gang. After threatening them with the police, two of them peeled off into a shop and the others continued on, mute and expressionless, as if nothing had happened.

It’s a good job my wife did pre-empty the attempt because god knows what we would have done if the thieves had gotten hold of those half eaten bread rolls, spare tampons, sticky fast food toys and salivated water bottles…

Bikes are a good way to get around. Notice the different sized wheels on the bikes to deter thieves.

Bikes are a good way to get around. Notice the different sized wheels on the bikes to deter thieves.

As the city is so compact we bought a tourist bus ticket. These are normally so overpriced in the tourist cities that we avoid them but in this instance we thought we could get a feel for the city and its geography by taking a tour. Don’t be tempted to buy a second day’s pass for a discounted rate as they encourage you to do and as we did, to use as city transport, —it’s a false economy, you spend an hour on a bus to go a few miles to a particular tourist attraction. Otherwise, the Metro is pretty much idiot proof and quite cheap if you buy a t-10 ticket which gives you 10 rides for a discounted price.

A typical balcony in Barcelona

A typical balcony in Barcelona

In the supermarket I was mistaken for a local and asked something in Spanish. I shrugged and said “English” and he apologised for his stupid mistake (it was his eyes rolling that gave me that impression). But what does it mean when you are mistaken for a local, am I badly dressed, in the wrong place… what?

Barca5

Barcelona is synonymous with Gaudi and going by the huge crowds flocking round the La Sagrada Familia, I think it is safe to say that Gaudi must have started the whole, ‘architecture as spectacle’ phenomenon that is spreading through the world like a contagion. Gaudi was clearly unique in his vision. He was probably straddling the line between genius and madman more than most artists. Fortunately for him he was able to convince enough monied persons that he was more genius than madman for him to realise his grand visions.

But today he is responsible for a pernicious craze. Tourists travel the globe to see his creation and spend a lot of money doing it. If I were the mayor of a large city I would commission the building of a crazy structure on a monumental scale in the heart of the city. The craziness of the structure would become a tourist attraction and make money even if the rent from the building didn’t. And this is exactly what is happening around the world. The problem is, of course, that the ante is continually being raised and last years crazy is simply not crazy enough to compete with the current crop of crazies. In the meantime, someone has to work in these buildings…

A 'human statue' taking a break outside the La Sagrada Familia

A 'human statue' taking a break outside the La Sagrada Familia

The second pickpocket strike was after a visit to Las Ramblas, which is the most popular street in Barcelona for tourists and has all the street artists. It was late in the evening and we had settled down at a table in a fast food outlet (we have kids). I had put my rucksack onto the seat next to me and one of its carry strap was just resting over the back of the chair. As you would expect, the restaurant was very busy and as I was leaning across the table and talking with my son, out of the corner of my eye I saw my rucksack slowly float upwards and away from me like a naughty helium balloon trying to hide under someone’s coat. In a mild state of disbelief I grabbed my rucksack from underneath the coat and looked at the unfortunate owner of the coat who had ‘accidentally’ got tangled with my rucksack. He was a middle aged white man dressed in a slightly odd tourist attire with a black leather belt on the outside of his jumper. He gave me a slightly surprised expression of, ‘Oh, is this yours?’ then casually walked out of the restaurant.

Being inexperienced in confronting a thief caught in the act, I was still trying to decide whether it could be a genuine mistake or not whilst he made his getaway. But then when I comprehended the incident for what it was—a blatant attempt at bag snatching— I wondered what I would have done with that knowledge at the moment of catching him? Would I tackle him? Shout ’stop thief’? Knee him in the groin? Unlikely. So it is no wonder that the thieves have developed such brazen tactics. Later, I noticed a smartly dressed employee of the restaurant who just hung around in the dining area. At first we surmised he was there to stop people who weren’t customers from using the toilets but then I guessed he was also there to deter the thieves as he must eventually get to recognise the more prolific ones. Anyway, it’s a good job I prevented the theft because god knows what I would have done if the thief had taken my rucksack and robbed me of that half eaten packet of  cashew nuts, tatty fleece and salivated water bottle…

There are lots of cowboys on Las Ramblas but at least this one is honest about it.

There are lots of cowboys on Las Ramblas but at least this one is honest about it.

The beach is a rare and welcome alternative to a city visit. The officials seem to take great care of them and regularly sweep them for rubbish.  All along the beach they have these speech bubble signs which remind people to take their trash with them when they leave along with other health messages.  When we were there, the sea was warmer than the air temperature! In the summer, I’ll bet that they are heaving with locals and tourists (and thieves).

Yep, this is a real sign on the beach.

Yep, this is a real sign on the beach.

The National art gallery in the city (MNAC) is housed up a hill, in a spectacular building which has a spectacular view of the city all the way to the coast. The artworks inside are of a good standard but I couldn’t find anything that stood out as remarkable or particularly moving.

Some gorgeous painting in this picture

Some gorgeous painting in this picture

We also visited the contemporary art gallery (MACBA) which is in the old Gothic part of the city, and were hugely disappointed by its content. I could only find this piece which made me stop and look closely.

The one terrific painting I could find in MACBA

The one terrific painting I could find in MACBA

My son is underwhelmed by MACBA

My son is underwhelmed by MACBA

The third attempt by the Barcelona thieves to divest us of our possessions  occurred when we visited Parc de la Ciutadella, which also houses the local zoo, and we went up this monument.

Site of the third attempt to rob us.

Site of the third attempt to rob us.

At the top, we were approached by a gang of teenage girls, seemingly patrolling the monument. One of them, armed with a clipboard and a pen approached me and in reasonable English told me about the petition they were trying to raise. They were aiming to get a lift built onto the monument to allow disabled access. To emphasise her words she pointed to a ‘disabled’ logo printed at the top of the lined sheet of paper on her clipboard. It was then that I noticed the appalling quality of the photocopied sheet she proffered me. But hey, how could I not agree with such a noble cause? I signed the sheet with my name and wrote ‘London’ as my place of origin as I figured Wakefield would be meaningless to a civic member of Barcelona. No other details were asked for. I can only imagine that the girls had read and understood the book, Influence by Robert Cialdini because they then moved on from a small request to a much bigger one and asked for a donation. The main protagonist in all this was then joined by several of her helpers who all looked at me with expectant faces. As someone who was a tourist who was unlikely to visit the city again, let alone this particular spot, I couldn’t see why a donation from me was even being asked for and besides, what has a petition got to do with donations?

I said, “Whoa, you’ve just lost me at this point. I’m not donating anything.”

The main protagonist understood this which immediately made her change tack and she then asked for some form of identification—such as a business card— from which she could verify the signature. Her supporting cast then behaved like a Greek chorus and all the girls shouted in unison, “No money! No money!”

Unfortunately for them, they had hit upon the very path which was guaranteed to terminate my interest, the beaurocratic administrative one, and I told them in no uncertain terms that my co-operation had ceased. I made to move on which prompted another invocation of “No money! No money!” from the impassioned chorus. Their insistence merely increased my discourtesy and we eventually blanked them like shop mannequins (where had we seen that tactic before?) Five minutes later, as we were walking away from the structure, we heard the shout of a young woman quickly followed by the sight of two of the teenage girls vaulting over a fence and haring across the park like a couple of feral bitches. The young woman, who’s shout we had heard, then appeared at the fence along with a park attendant. Their conversation established that the young woman had retrieved her money. The teenage girls’ strategy then became clear; all their exhortations for donations and identification was simply for them to get sight of a purse or wallet (where else would you keep a business card?), which they would then make a grab for and once acquired, run off. As I had neither wallet nor business card, this strategy was doomed to failure from the start with me but clearly had some success with the young woman tourist who must have been behind us in the tourist line.

Don’t go to the Aquarium, it’s overpriced and underwhelming. The only ‘novelty’ it has is a a travellator along a section of glass wall (yawn).  When you’ve been to one Aquarium, you’ve been to them all. We went on a Friday which is some kind of holiday in Barcelona; everyone dresses down and the school kids seem to be on holiday and form giant queues to such tourist attractions as the, um, Aquarium.

Barca3

On the plane home I was reminded just how little flying has to do with travelling than it has to do with escapology; “On this journey, I will be placed in a box constructed on all sides with metal and plastic. I will be without oxygen for the duration that I am in it and be forced to breathe only stale air composed entirely of bad breathe and various body odours. At the same time I will be deafened by a constant barrage of white noise. Despite all this I will emerge relatively unscathed, in two hours time in a location many miles from here.”

My overall impression of Barcelona is one of, ‘it’s all right.’ There is nothing spectacular about the place and nothing especially uninviting (apart from the mosquito like attendance of pick pockets). Overall, we preferred Berlin and Rome.

The Occupy Wall Street movement

October 29th, 2011

There has been some criticism from the mainstream media about the Occupy Wall Street movement and its lack of specific aims. I will respond to that by turning the question around; what are the specific aims of the world’s wealthiest 1% of the population?

As far as I am aware they haven’t issued any specific aims to the mainstream media for them to report but any switched on member of the public will be aware of the one unspoken aim of these people, namely, to make that 1% an even smaller figure. This can be inferred from their propensity to award themselves huge salary increases without any relation to their company performance (or anything else, for that matter). Therefore any link to ‘fairness’ is broken: they get richer simply because they can.

Why is that not criticised by the mainstream media? Ah yes, now I remember, the mainstream media is owned by the 1%.

So the non-specific ‘aims’ of the Occupy Wall Street movement are simply to stop that unacceptable figure of 1% from shrinking even further and to make it increase as rapidly possible so that more of the population can share the wealth.

Of course, the real reason that the mainstream media are criticising the movement in any way they can is fear. The Occupy Wall Street movement represents a growing awareness of the peoples own power. The 1% know this. The figure of 99% is a huge one. If the people it represents could organise themselves effectively, they would become an unstoppable force.

Why Bettakultcha has to replace Motivational Speakers

October 13th, 2011

BK-t-shirt-1

Before I explain Bettakultcha, let’s look at the business of motivational speaking. The speaker’s brief is usually to ‘motivate’ the audience into working harder or smarter for the organization that hired them. The speakers are generally flown into an organization at great expense and with great fanfare. They are usually ‘experts’ of some kind in their field, but that expertise can be limited to just themselves—they have climbed a mountain or were born with some kind of disability. During their presentation it is their intention to beguile, harangue, seduce, enthrall, advise, inspire and lift the audience with their stories into a feel good, ‘can do’ mood. The very best are paid huge fees and speak internationally.

But how does this help the people in the audience? If the speaker has a unique story to tell then it can only be relevant to the typical audience member in an oblique and abstract way—if I can do it, you can too. The speaker is also, more often than not, a stranger to the organization that they’re speaking to and has no knowledge of the culture that exists within the organization.

If the speaker is able to raise the energy in the audience then they go away with their cheque and with their ego suitably bolstered. They have done something that is motivating in itself. The feel good mood in the audience, however, dissipates almost as soon as they re-enter the workplace—or the real life situation that they were seeking help for or were distracted from—by the presentation. Occasionally the speaker comes back to run various workshops to try and maintain some sort of momentum from their initial visit but the truth of the matter is this: just paying attention to people is what makes a difference—what kind of attention is largely irrelevant—it is the attention which gives the result. There’s even been a study done of the phenomenon and a name given to the effect: the Hawthorne effect.

If this is true, then you might as well hire a comedian as opposed to a motivational speaker for your conference (and in truth, most in-demand speakers are just good entertainers with aphorisms thrown in). The other truth is this: motivational speakers are motivating themselves. Motivational speakers get off on showing off their own motivation, by climbing a higher mountain than their competitors, by getting a higher fee than their competitors, by getting louder applause that their predecessors. That is not to deny that some are well intentioned, and genuinely want to help their fellow human beings.

The other problem with motivational talks is that we all like to be told what we want to hear: yes, you can be a millionaire… yes you have what it takes to climb a mountain… yes your value systems are correct… Well, if you only tell people what they want to hear, then you can’t be telling them anything new, you’re simply reinforcing old ideas but delivering them in novel packaging.

So how does Bettakultcha revolutionise motivational speaking?

The people who attend a Bettakultcha event can testify to the transformational power generated by the experience although they’re not quite sure what that power is. This is because the entire focus of the event shifts from ‘appointed speakers’ to volunteers from the audience. The audience, therefore, motivates itself.

Who are the experts?

If you are in an organization, then the person who is most qualified to speak to you about your organization is you… because you work there. The only consultants you should be hiring into your organization are facilitators, not speakers. Outside consultants have to start from scratch: any useful advice about the practical running of an organization that they can give is totally predicated on the culture existing within that organization, so they have to study the culture first. You already know the culture.

How does Bettakultcha motivate people?

The way you motivate people is by giving them real power, not by giving them a speech.

Good speakers follow certain techniques to engage with an audience and one of the best is direct engagement with an individual member of the audience. They ask a general question and then have a short conversation with whoever answers their question. They engage like this because they know it keeps the audience on their toes and involves them personally. From the audience member’s point of view, they will feel good about themselves for contributing to the proceedings and because they do actually mean something to the event – they count as a person.

Bettakultcha gives the audience real power because it actually lets them speak.

Bettakultcha empowers the audience by making them responsible for the event. If the good speaker is so concerned about making a connection with the audience, about empowering the audience, about motivating the audience, why doesn’t he or she relinquish control of the event? Become a spectator rather than a contributor? Surely, this is the desired outcome of a perfectly successful motivational speech? “A great leader makes the people think they had achieved everything by themselves”? The greatest outcome that any good speaker could wish for is to think ‘that was a good presentation; my work is done here; I have given the organization the tools to be able to progress without me.’

And as for the members of the organization who contribute to the event by presenting, how much more powerful is it to have these people in your organization for months on end inspiring and motivating the other workers instead of someone who visits for a couple of hours every year or so? Imagine the sense of community that this will engender—the workers will learn more about themselves and feel inspired by some of the stories they will hear from people they can chat with on a day-to-day basis.

And as previous presenters from Bettakultcha have told me, their sense of achievement after their presentation is intoxicating and gives them the confidence to attempt other things outside of their comfort zone.

From a managerial perspective, the presentations could give an indication of the morale within the organization and highlight some of the issues concerning the members. The management could even be alerted to potential skills and experience within their organization, which they had no idea existed and which might be utilized in the future.

The key to having a successful event, however, is the curation and delivery. It has to be perceived as a fun activity and one that is generally outside of the formal structure of the organization. The facilitator of the event then becomes crucial in this regard. To simply lift the format without regard for the above considerations is a recipe for disappointment.

If the future is going to require adaptable, capable, confident members of society, then there is no better place to find them than at a Bettakultcha event.

The accelerating pace of change: 2

September 27th, 2011

Following on from Matt Edgar’s blog post, I have attempted to be more specific here in my arguments for the rate of change in our modern society as compared with previous eras.

The idea of accelerating pace of change is so prevalent in our culture that it is hard to imagine that it is an illusion. I brought the subject up with a web developer the other day and he vehemently confirmed what we already suspect by claiming that the very foundations of the industry in which he works are changing under his feet as he tries to build, it was simply impossible to keep up with the changes.

Matt has identified the major difficulty in the ‘accelerating pace of change’ argument; what are we comparing and how do we measure it? At first glance this would appear as fruitless as trying to compare the intensity of pain that people feel today with that felt by people from thousands of years ago. How could we know for sure unless we experienced pain ourselves from both eras?

Comparing historical time frames also becomes difficult as single spectacular events such as Mount Tambora or the French revolution distort the picture significantly in any snapshot of a lifetime. We need something more general and universal that we can extrapolate backwards from.

I believe a metric can be found in something that is of significance to all human beings throughout all of human history: weapons.

The accelerating pace of change in weapons technology

The accelerating pace of change in weapons technology

This graph demonstrates how the development of weapons has increased in frequency and complexity over time. It also demonstrates how each new development— from the Acheulean hand axe, to the nuclear bomb—produces a much greater potential for destruction (and therefore ‘change’) for any human experience.

Another example of accelerating pace of change is life itself. As the universe tends towards entropy over time, life charges in the opposite direction and produces more complex organisms over time. Look at the structure of a tree and you can immediately see how the organism develops from a single stem into more and more complex and diverse branches until the canopy edge is a profusion of activity. It is a logical extrapolation to imagine human culture following the same bifurcation.

Another excellent metric is to imagine how relevant our lifetime’s experiences will be to our children’s lifetime. If we were still hunter-gatherers then the knowledge we had acquired in our lifetime would still be relevant to our children and would be so for generations of children to come. Agriculture probably shortened the longevity of such wisdom from millennia to centuries as climate change occurred at irregular intervals. Until only a couple of generations ago, it was accepted that the son of a clerk would probably follow the occupation of his father and that that son would have a job for life. The daughter of the clerk would have got married, had children and stayed at home. So what knowledge can we pass onto our children today that they will find useful in twenty years time? I think we can safely say that only a fool would attempt to guess what the next ten years will bring, let alone a lifetime and that whatever it does bring, we can be sure that it will be unrecognizable to today’s youth.

Returning to my first example of the history of weapons, we get a clue as to what the major modern malaise is really about. One of the side effects of a nuclear bomb (which is sometimes more feared than the primary effect) is the Electromagnetic Pulse that would disable electronic devices and the data held on them. And here is the essence of what we are really talking about: information.

It is indeed true that human nature has changed very little over time and Isaac Newton would have gone to a coffee house to discuss business arrangements with colleagues, just as we do today. Except today, ordering a coffee takes a huge amount of time if you are new to the establishment and need to consider all the options. Presumably, Issac had two choices— to have a coffee or not. It is this option fatigue that people refer to most when they talk of the accelerating rate of change. Even in my lifetime, I have seen this exponential growth in information and choice.

Take the example of television. Once, just a few decades ago you bought a CRT black and white television with one or two channels available. Then, eventually you had the additional channel of commercial television. Technological advances then gave you the choice of colour sets instead of just monochrome. Today, you have a choice of three different technologies for the delivery of the picture—plasma, LCD and LED. And this is before you investigate whether you want 3D, Smart TV, HD Freeview, FreeSat, Sky and whatever else is available that I am not currently familiar with. Remember, we haven’t even got to the important part of deciding what actual content we want to watch from the thousands of possible channels on offer. The bewildering array of channels is daunting to begin with but once we do watch something then we see the paradox of all this content, of quality being traded for quantity. And no sooner have we familiarized ourselves with most of the controls and options on the new fangled TV then another type of holographic television replaces it requiring the acquisition of a whole new set of skills. One can’t imagine a worker on a farm from hundreds of years ago complaining that he’d only just got the hang of the horse drawn plough before something else comes along which entirely replaces it.

It is not so much the rate of change that we complain about or try to measure, as the amount of information we have to process and we have already reached information overload in modern times.

There is one other factor that lends credence to the idea of the accelerating rate of change, one that is deliberately designed to act as an accelerant to the phenomenon: consumerism.

Consumerism demands an accelerating pace of change even when there isn’t one. There are many products on the market that change from year to year not because there has been significant innovation in them but because they need to appear as if there has been to keep the consumers buying. Make and models appear and disappear at an increasing rate and more often than not, new models are not backwards compatible. Even in journalism, this constant recycling of apparently new ‘innovation’ is referred to as ‘churnalism’.

Matt does acknowledge this digital revolution, but that is precisely the point: transporting physical goods at five hundred miles per hour is the old way of doing things, digital transport happens at the speed of light and so more of it occurs.

Take the financial sector in London. They’re even building a super fast trans Atlantic cable so that the dealers in London can get a nanosecond advantage over their rivals. That’s the accelerating pace of change at work. And if we go back to our example of physical transport, the speed of shipping today probably is close to that of the steam age but the sheer quantity of shipping is many times that of previous centuries and the variety of goods that they bring is also multiplied many times.

Matt’s point about the influence of the media in all of this is crucial and significant. Yes, the media industry is going through turmoil currently as a direct result of this digital revolution, but the media is responsible for hosing the world with accelerant. The media has simply set fire to itself.

Here is my conclusion:

Human beings can only experience so many stimuli. In the past, these stimuli would have comprised of qualia from the natural world. The moon, stars and cycles of nature would have been very real to human experience. We have evolved in a symbiotic relationship with the natural world and learned to deal with it. But now, those of industry displace the experiences of nature and evolution doesn’t work at the same speed. I could go on about the exponential rise of depression in modern populations to prove my point, but I’ll leave that for another time.

The thing about the media and information overload, is that it separates us from purpose. The limitless information we now have access to is a universe away from the time when our only access to information might have been a bible, written in Latin. There is so much information that we spend too much time trying to comprehend it and not enough time considering what we want to do with it. In fact I would go so far to say than when people talk about the rate of change they are specifically referring to information—new legislation, new specifications for buildings, new ways of paying your bills etc. More of our time is taken up with processing information.

I agree wholeheartedly with Matt’s conclusion: the ramifications of resigned acceptance of overwhelming change are bad for society. The movers and shakers of this world are becoming fewer and the shaken, far more numerous. It is time to take a stand against the tyranny of learned helplessness and become the masters of our own destiny once again.

The accelerating rate of change

September 5th, 2011

Following a discussion with Matt Edgar about the accelerating pace of change in the modern world (Matt denies this phenomenon exists) I propose a quasi-scientific proof of concept (and my apologies for any inaccurate science in my reasoning).

Consider a gas contained in a fixed volume. The molecules have a certain amount of space within which to vibrate and interact. If you add more molecules into the fixed volume, the interaction between them all will increase producing a higher pressure and higher temperature. If more molecules are added then at some point the gas will reach a tipping point and become a liquid. At this point the rate of change is accelerated and demonstrable.

Now consider a human population contained in a fixed space. The interactions between the people will occur at a certain rate. Increase the population in the fixed space and the interactions have to increase proportionally. If the people are creative as well, then the resultant interactions are likely to produce even greater ‘temperatures’ than would be expected.

This phenomenon is observed in the animal kingdom. A swarm of locusts is created when grasshoppers interact at a specific rate. The grasshopper population metamorphosing into a swarm of locusts represents the transformation of a gas into a liquid and the rate of change is accelerated and observable. The consequences of that swarm of locusts on the surrounding area represents what happens when the pressure inside the fixed container becomes too great for the container to hold and an explosion occurs. Again the rate of change is then accelerated and observable.

This change from a stable condition to an unstable one is perfectly demonstrated in the example of fish farms. The increased density of fish in a fixed volume of water produces unforeseen consequences to the environment. The incidence of disease and parasites within the farmed fish increases dramatically. The faeces from the fish cannot be processed quickly enough by the natural biological cycles within the system and the result is ecological devastation for the sea bed. So change is brought about by an imbalance in the system (whatever that system is).

Therefore, I assert that modern civilisation is inherently imbalanced in nearly all of its practices, from agriculture to the financial systems and that the process of maintaining these unsustainable systems is an accelerating one and the inevitable catastrophe when these systems collapse will represent accelerated and observable change.