International Women’s Day, The Monastery, Gorton, Manchester

March 9th, 2010

Caricature at International Women's Day in Manchester Monastery

An example of some of the work I did at the event.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]

Another stunning sunset from my bedroom window

March 9th, 2010

Fiery sky

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]

BettaKultcha 1, Temple Works, Leeds

March 4th, 2010

Rob
This review is bound to be biased as I was a co-organizer of this event and also the compere. The story behind it has all the classic markings of a vintage 60’s ‘Summer Holiday‘ movie, with a bunch of enthusiastic kids declaring. “Hey, why don’t we put the show on right here!”

Well, those kids were Richard Michie and myself and the “right here” was Temple Works.

BettaKultcha itself is a play on Pecha Kucha which has a rigid format for PowerPoint presentations - 20 slides lasting 20 seconds each. We elected to have 20 slides lasting 15 seconds each making each presentation exactly five minutes long. People can present about anything they want to and on the night, that’s exactly what people did!

We literally made it up as we went along including the room layout which took several shapes before it morphed into the most practical one. Temple Works is currently in the process of being renovated, however, people turned up with a ‘camping’ attitude - bags of alcohol, thermals and hamper loads of enthusiasm.

Richard has already catalogued all the presenters in his blog here so I will just mention my particular highlights of the evening.

A fun time was had by all and there were lots of give-aways including five very rare and precious twelve inch singles by the cult band Gentle Ihor’s Devotion. An invaluable little red book was also generously given out by Mike Chitty. One of the concerns that Richard and I had about the evening might be the lack of presenters. As a plan b we decided to put together a set of random slides in case someone was mad enough to get up on the night and spontaneously talk over the slides. ‘Yeah, right, ‘course they will’, we thought.

During the break in the proceedings I spoke to Lee Jackson who was attending but not presenting. He was enjoying the show enormously and, as he was a professional speaker, I suggested to him that he might like to take up the challenge of the random slides. I could see the mad glint in his eye and he said he would consider it. In the latter half of the show a couple of guys who called themselves The Story Hunters presented a crazy exploration of additional dimensions in the universe. This included a selection of videos which failed to play when required to do so. To their everlasting credit, the gentlemen improvised a spirited response to the blank screen which suggested that they were;

a) seasoned performers b) drunk or c) both.

At the end of the evening I announced the still vacant slot of random slides presenter and asked if Lee had made up his mind. He said that he would do it if the Story Hunters joined him in the presentation. This was an invitation that they could not refuse and we had an additional ‘performance’.

The main body of the evening was great. But what these guys did with their performance was to turn the evening into sensational. For those of you who weren’t there, this is the calibre of improvisation; a slide of a twopenny coin stumped the group for a story-line so one of them decided to faint. Yup, faint. How brilliant is that! The place was in hysterics. I do hope that this is included in any video footage released by Media Squared.

So funny, so dangerous, so unpredictable was this random slide slot that we have decided to repeat it for the next BettaKultcha but to have two slots instead of one. The only change to the format will be that each random slot will have 10 slides instead of 20 as people can only take so much danger.

Thanks to everyone who helped put the show on (and take it off) and we look forward to the next event which will be on April 27th 2010 at Temple Works.

Lee Jackson

Lee Jackson and one of The Story Hunters

Mike Chitty

Mike Chitty with a camera on his head enjoying the show

Richar Mitchie

Richard Michie setting up

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]

Martyn Ware talking at Leeds College of Art

February 26th, 2010

Mr Ware’s opening slide after his intro flashed up a long list of black and white text with bullet points. Just then, a huge man dressed in combat fatigues, stood up at the back of the lecture theatre, produced an AK47 from under his jacket and commenced blasting Mr Ware with machine gun fire whilst screaming in a thick guttural Austrian accent, “Vot do you tink of deez bullet points!”

Then I woke up from my fantasy and realised that yes, Mr Ware was actually reading out the list from his slide and that no intended irony was being employed whatsoever by him doing so.

Jumping ahead somewhat, one of Mr Ware’s criticisms of our current culture, is that it just doesn’t ‘get’ his product when he tries to sell it to them (his main product is sound as an emotional and physical experience). Part of the problem, he maintains, is that the language of sound simply isn’t in place yet. Let me offer a rival theory.

In our current culture, the visual language is well established. It is so well established and so overused in fact,  that only the strongest visual signals register on our consciousness. That means if you have a particular message that you want to get across, you cannot afford to have a weak signal. The language of PowerPoint has been well documented and developed. Bullet-points are visual equivalents of profanity. Perhaps if Mr Ware applied some of his thinking around the language of sound and applied it to his visuals, he might get a better response to his message about his sound product.

OK, rant over, what is this language of sound? Mr Ware described a particular installation he did in some city square. A large number of speakers were placed around the square at different heights and a computer program controlled the projection of sounds and moved them around the square. Thus, the sound of a helicopter could be made to ‘appear’ overhead and move the sound across the square, or the sound of traffic could be channelled down certain avenues. I must admit, this particular example had me amused with its irony. Surely such effects could be achieved by simply sitting in the middle of a city square? A similar irony was raised when he talked about electric cars.

Electric cars make no noise when they move at low speeds and so pedestrians are particularly vulnerable to the danger of walking out in front of them. New legislation would require all silent cars to emit a noise when moving. The question is, what sort of noise should they emit? The obvious solution is to make them sound like cars but this demonstrates an enormous poverty of imagination. Anyone who lives by the side of a busy road will testify to the nuisance noise caused by traffic (that is if they can be overhead). If the opportunity is there to have silence, it should be investigated thoroughly - is there some other way of alerting pedestrians of the presence of cars? If silence is not an option then a more pleasing sound should be considered than that of a clapped out diesel engine. What about using the sound of a woman having an orgasm, or one of children laughing? What about natural sounds - a swarm of bees or the sound of a stream? Running water would be a good choice as an increase in traffic volume, such as on a motorway, would result in a roar similar to a giant waterfall.

To my mind, the one area of real interest regarding the soundscape idea lies in the direction of evoking emotional states. It would be intriguing to experience the movement and texture of sounds from the past, for example, but a large part of me is not convinced that it can ever be more than just a novelty in the same way that 3D cinema currently is (although some people are claiming we are on the verge of a new age of cinema).

It could have been a fascinating evening if Mr Ware had dispensed with his slides and instead rigged up a small demonstration of the soundscape in the lecture theatre so that the speakers could have done the speaking instead. We could have even had some fun. Incidentally, I am available if anyone needs the power of their slides boosting to a stronger signal.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]

Avatar film review, Bradford Imax

February 16th, 2010

Gather round people and let me tell you a story. It is a very old story, passed down from generation to generation. It tells of the human condition, of good and evil and how things never change. But more importantly, it tells of the American people and their irresistible ways…

As this film is so BIG in terms of money and award nominations, I thought I would let it give me its best shot on its home turf - five stories of glorious Imax screen, jigawatts of audio power and wrap-around 3D - come on big boy, show me what you got.. aw, you’re just a pussy cat..

And that was pretty much the tone of the entire film; gung ho, macho posturing contrasting with a lot of touchy-feely stuff. Mr Cameron, the writer and director of Avatar, has seen a whole bunch of films in his lifetime, I know this because he referenced so many of them in his film. The list is huge - Matrix, Starship Trooper, Apocalypto, Star Wars, Braveheart, Alien, Princess Mononoke… at one point in the film one of the characters said, “Feel the Force, Luke!” Okay, not those exact words, but it might as well have been. It is impossible to give any spoilers away about this film because if you haven’t seen it already, you will know its story off by heart. It is cliché after goddamn cliché telling the tale about the ‘primitive’ Na’vi people who are at one with nature. Credit where it is due though for Mr Cameron is such an experienced film maker that he makes sure that they are the best goddamn clichés that you will ever feel manipulating your gullible emotions. Well, at least until his next blockbuster.

So what is the fuss about? Well, by far the best worked character in the film is the forest. It is sumptuous, an absolute feast for the eyes. The Enchanted Forest never looked so good. Actually, it did and sometimes it looked a bit too good, rather like photo’s of Barbie on her wedding day which have been airbrushed to a comical level. Although I have to admit the flora and fauna inventions of this gravity defying world kept me entertained for long stretches of the film. Some back room boys somewhere deserve a huge pat on the back for their magnificent achievement.

What disturbed me the most however is the disingenuousness of the story. Ostensibly it is about the American Military-Industrial complex, dispossessing indigenous peoples and slaughtering them because they sit on top of oil (or its equivalent) which is something that the Americans crave and will stop at nothing to own. One of the Americans is ordered to infiltrate these people and discover their weaknesses, except he goes native and discovers their strengths instead (as well as their sexual potency - boy, I bet you didn’t see that coming!). He becomes their hero by flying some big red dragon (only five people in the history of the Na’vi have ever flown the red dragon, we are told) and leads them into war against the Military-Industrial complex (the Americans are particularly good at leading people into war). A fight ensues, our hero asks the god of his adopted planet to help in this fight, which it agrees to do (so now the Na’vi are fighting a just war with god on their side.., hmm, where have I heard that before?), the Military-Industrial complex gets beat and its minions are summarily despatched back home. The End.

Except it is not about that, it is about the American ideology of Imperialism presented in a disguised way. Our sympathy is on the side of the Na’vi who are at one with nature (although we have to ask in what way do the big red dragons - and the other flighted people carriers - benefit, especially as they are killed in the fighting?) but they need the help of the clever American to organise them, to lead them, the clever American who also rode the fearsome red dragon, the clever American who stole the heart of their princess with his acts of daring and cunning…

This is propaganda of the highest order. We think the friendly Americans come in peace and they understand us and want to be our friends but secretly they just want to screw us over and screw our women too. Ha! I’m not that stupid, Mr Cameron.

But something more sinister is at play here. As I watched the exquisite detail swarm across the acres of projection screen I was cowed by the sheer, intimidating processing power involved in the creation of every frame of that film. The implied might of their CGI is far more powerful than any of their napalm or helicopter gun ships. ‘What men created this?’ I gasped. I sat in its shadow and trembled.

To paraphrase a line from the film;

“Run! goddamn you, run! These people and their ideology will kill you!”

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]

Then the light came on…

February 9th, 2010

wall light with picture

Sometimes it becomes obvious why you should use a professional.

When we were having our living room refurbished, we wanted to put a couple of picture lights in the wall. The electrician came to price up the job and when it came to the wall lights he asked us from which direction we wanted the wiring - from the ceiling or from the floor? We asked which direction would cause least disruption. He said, as we were having extra sockets put in, we might as well have the wiring for the lights coming from the floor as well. Then he told us to mark on the plaster where we wanted to position the lights and he would come in a few days time to cut the channels and lay the wiring.

As I was trying to save labour costs with the refurbishment and had done most of the preparation work, I considered cutting the channels myself for the wiring. It was within my skill set and didn’t need any specialist tools. I thought the job through.. draw a vertical line from the point of the light straight down to the floor, then cut a channel in the plaster about three centimetres wide using a cold chisel.. dust everywhere..

On reflection, I decided that it was going to save very little in terms of cost as it would take the electrician only minutes to cut the channel because he would be practised at it. I passed on doing the job myself.

The day arrived when the electrician was going to complete the job. I left him to it as he gazed upon the plaster wall with a practised eye. I too gazed at the wall and imagined the new gleaming picture lights before going into my office to do some work.

An hour or two later I came downstairs again to check on progress. The room was littered with wire, tools and lifted floor boards. Then I looked at the wall and had a moment of puzzlement. The electrician had cut the channels for the wiring but they were fifteen centimetres to the left of where I would have cut them. Also at about thirty centimetres from where the wall light was supposed to emerge from the wall, the channel took a deviation from the vertical and bent to meet that point.

In a flash, I realised why he had cut the channels like that.

I envisioned the moment when I would eventually want to hang a picture. Chances are, I will only use one nail to hang it and, more than likely, I will want the picture to be placed centrally underneath the wall light. If the wiring had been laid exactly vertically as I had imagined it, then the nail would have interfered with the wiring. By shifting the wiring to one side then bending it in, the electrician had avoided this problem.

Had I cut the channels without thinking the whole thing through, I would have been achieving the exact opposite of what I intended - incurring costs instead of saving them.
This is the  reason we hire professionals; they know more than us (usually) and they are good at what they do (usually).

So if you ever need to refurbish your creativity space, don’t try and do it yourself with any ‘obvious’ short cuts but hire me to advise you with some ‘off the wall’ hints and tips that give you solutions that come at you from a different angle (see what I did there? You could do the same with a little help).

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]

You’ll either get this or you won’t

February 3rd, 2010

You’ll either get this or you won’t. There is no normal anymore.

All the old models are breaking, one by one. The financial crisis was a wake up call for everyone in society who thought that asking dumb questions was a dumb thing to do. It forced some of us to ask, “Where are we going? What is the ultimate consequence of this path?”

You are reading this because, in one way or another, you have asked these questions yourself and discovered that any sort of answer is hard to find in mainstream media. In which case, I invite you to join our growing caravan of freethinkers on the World Wide Web. This caravan seeks knowledge, for knowledge is power. Unfortunately, to many people, that means knowledge should be patented, restricted, modified, charged for… But this is to misunderstand how knowledge works; when added together, knowledge becomes greater than the sum of its parts. That is its power. Cooperation triumphs over competition. You’ll either get this or you won’t.

I have kept a record of the journey so far and gathered together my experiences and insights into a video presentation called SatNav for the Soul®. It is a story of great adventure.

You may be familiar with adventurers who talk about their exploits in climbing mountains. Mine is a similar story except my mountains are metaphorical. They are the big ideas that shape our very lives but which very few of us ever consider. I have explored them as best I can and now I would like to share some of my discoveries with you – some may empower you and some may surprise you.

You’re probably asking yourself, ‘How can SatNav for the Soul® help me?’ This is a tough one to answer because most people value those things that are the least useful to them. So if I said, “It can empower you”, a lot of people would want to interpret that as, ‘it can increase my income,’ which has the whole thing backward. Don’t get me wrong, money is useful but increasing your income begs many questions that need to be answered first. You’ll either get this or you won’t.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]

Creative Networks review. Martin Parr, Leeds College of Art

January 29th, 2010

Picture this; you’ve gone to see one of your favourite bands perform at a concert. The band come on stage and then ask you, the audience, which type of show you want to see. Do you want to hear:

a) the bands back catalogue of old favourites (um, obviously),
b) only their most recent work without any favourites, or
c) a set of them covering obscure songs recorded by other less well known artists?

Then they ask for a show of hands.

This is what Martin Parr, a celebrated British photographer did to his audience on this evening. He said he had never done this before and now let me tell you why he will probably never do it again.

When I go to see a performance of whatever art form, I expect to see what I have been ’sold’ via the publicity (I should mention that this was a free event). If the publicity doesn’t specify exactly what the content will be, I expect the performer to give me their best shot, not their second (or third) best shot. I also don’t expect to have to start making last minute choices about which show I want to see when I am not familiar with the content of the other choices, especially in these enervating times of option fatigue.

The reason for this debacle was clearly highlighted in the phrasing of one of the choices that Mr Parr offered the audience. He asked if we wanted to hear his usual, boring story about how he got here, or…etc.

This is the age old curse of the populist performer; he is bored with doing the same old thing time after time but his loyal and/or novice audience expect to hear the stuff that made him popular in the first place. Mr Parr forgot that this was his problem, not ours, but he chose to foist it upon us that evening anyway.

What followed was akin to a deleted scene from a Mr Bean film. Steve Smith, the loquacious host of the event, attempted to impose some kind of structure to this process of selection. A show of hands was asked for and the usual, boring, option got the least votes (ironically Mr Parr later went on to talk about propaganda and he clearly understands the power of emotive words to influence an outcome or opinion). I voted for the boring option.

The other two options were evenly split and couldn’t be differentiated in a swift glance and so we had the ludicrous moment of Steve Smith asking for another show of hands and him carefully counting them (this in a packed lecture theatre of over two hundred people). Eventually, a tiny majority was decided upon and the choice was made - a satisfactory outcome for a less bored Mr Parr and for one third of the audience, but immediately you had two thirds of the losing voters feeling aggrieved that they are not going to get what they came for. Not a good start.

So, the winning option - a selection of other peoples work that he had in his collection - was duly commenced (why do we still have to see a computer desktop and hovering mouse on the screen before the show starts when surely, the technology exists to make a seamless transition?). Thus, we had slides of tea trays with photographs on them and also a lot of old postcards illustrating news events.

For an experienced photographer, Mr Parr seems to make some fundamental errors. He showed a picture of an American party bag of snacks housed in a glass cabinet. What he found so surreal about this image was that the bag was over a metre tall in reality. Unfortunately, there was nothing else in the picture that could give it a sense of scale and so we had to imagine what an ordinary looking snack packet would look like one metre tall. If I have to imagine, I don’t really need a photograph.

He also showed pictures of clocks he had collected from around the world which had photographs of famous people on the clock faces. He showed one that had Saddam Hussein smiling warmly from behind the arms of the clock. This raised a huge laugh from the audience. I’m afraid I cannot explain why this was, unless it was the desired effect of the West’s own powerful propaganda, conditioning people to laugh at and deride the vanquished evil ogre that once threatened our happy land. It could have been a private ironic prank by Mr Parr however, as he also showed Russian photography books from the Stalinist era that their owners were legally obliged to ‘amend’ as the famous people they depicted were liquidated and erased from history. This did not get a laugh.

Eventually we got to see some of Mr Parr’s own work, a series of images which depicted the idle rich enjoying themselves at parties and race meetings all over the world. These unflattering images evoked the work of Diane Arbus, the American photographer who is famous for depicting societies misfits with a dispassionate eye.

Mr Parr then explained some of his philosophical musings about photography and how it was being used to tell lies and to spread propaganda. For example, why do we only photograph our children in formal, happy poses, he asked, and not when they are crying or angry? I once asked this myself about comedy clubs; why don’t we have similar clubs who’s specific intention is to get the audience weeping instead (insert the name of whichever football club is on a losing streak here and claim that we do indeed have them already)?

And actually, I do video my kids having tantrums. I use the footage as ammunition when I want to counter their assertions that they are always well behaved and they ask, can we now have that expensive present please?

The presentation came alive  for me at this point because he was asking some serious and revealing questions about society and ourselves. It was such a pity that he restricted them to the last five minutes of his presentation. Given a choice, I would have voted to have the entire presentation devoted to them, but then, that wasn’t one of his offered options.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]

Eugenics is alive and well!

January 25th, 2010

There was a programme about dogs the other day (BBC Horizon programme, The Secret Life of the Dog) which asserted that all the breeds we have today are descended from the grey wolf. The programme then described various experiments which demonstrated how it is possible to get from a grey wolf to a dachshund, for example. The answer is eugenics. And one ongoing experiment in Siberia highlighted the possibilities of eugenics by using a parallel species - the silver fox.

A batch of foxes were bred in captivity and the individuals who demonstrated the least aggression were selected for the subsequent breeding stock. This process was repeated for many generations until the aggression was bred out of them. Eventually something fascinating happened; the foxes became as tame as domesticated dogs but also developed striking differences to their wild cousins. For example, their fur colour changed dramatically and varied enormously within the domesticated breed. For some reason the normal constraints of species design were loosened and allowed the foxes to develop into different breeds with marked characteristics.

In a different experiment in Hungary they attempted to rear first generation grey wolves in a domesticated environment alongside domesticated dogs. Whilst the wolves were in the juvenile phase of development they just about managed with a domesticated environment but as soon as they started to mature they became uncontrollable (for a domestic setting) and had to be returned to a captive pack of wolves.

My point is this. Like it or not, we are the products of a subtle eugenics programme. The industrialised system we have is not the evolutionary default setting for ‘wild’ humans. We have been selectively bred to encourage certain characteristics. For example, the entrepreneur is a breed of pit bull dog which aggressively attacks and kills competition, the merchants and brokers are a breed which take bets on the outcome of any dog fight, and society as a whole is a breed of easily trained, passive and obedient working dog.

You are also more likely to partner with someone from the social circle (for social circle read, breed) that you inhabit and thus produce offspring that is likely to have those dominant characteristics of that social circle. Once the process has been set in motion it is self perpetuating and greater extremes of each breed will be encouraged (imagine what the best basketball team will look like in the future), so if your system is designed badly to begin with, ridiculous looking and practically ‘useless’ breeds will appear.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not blaming anyone. There is no mad scientist in control. We just do what we are bred to do - the grey wolf in the domestic setting could easily point to the behaviour of the animals in the domestic setting and claim that it is unnatural and therefore its behaviour is more acceptable than that of the domestic animals.

If I pursue this analogy to any sort of conclusion then I would surmise that the breeding programme cannot be altered from within the programme, it is simply too big for any individual breed to have an impact. The actual breeding programme itself has to stop and our love of particular characteristics within breeds must be given up, otherwise we are in danger of producing such specialised breeds, for example the dachshund/multinational, that we are unable to adapt to the slightest change in circumstances.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]

Leeds Salon: Human Genes and animal rights

January 19th, 2010

Jeremy Taylor spoke at this event last night, largely to promote his new book, Not a Chimp. His premise was that ‘rights’ should not be extended to chimps because they are not like us.

So, for forty minutes, Mr Taylor went on in excruciating detail about the differences between chimps and humans, citing cognitive, genetic and physical differences. After ten minutes I kept being distracted by that other great intellectual problem of how many angels might be able to dance simultaneously on the head of a pin.

Of course chimps are different from us. So what?

Then after forty minutes he made his point in a sentence which took about thirty seconds to deliver; he didn’t like the way some scientists were anthropomorphising the chimps. He particularly didn’t like the work of Jane Goodall and Richard Dawkins in this context.

The ‘debate’ that followed (it was billed as a debate but in reality it was a presentation with a limited Q & A at the end) merely allowed Mr Taylor to expand on what  he had already pointed out.

My question to him was, ‘So what was at stake? What difference did it make to anything if chimps were, or were not, granted rights?’

Mr Taylor seemed to regard this question as one of complete ignorance as if I had wilfully neglected to follow the intricate story twists of the greatest scientific issue since Shroedinger nearly couldn’t make up his mind when he went to the pet shop.

As the questions continued about legislation and morality it seemed to me that the point was being entirely missed. Whether a species shares 98.4% of our genes, or invents tools or not, is irrelevant.

Here is my premise;

  • The concept of ‘rights’ is a purely human invention, as is time, property, law and land ownership and as such, is easily ignored when resources are being fought over.
  • We are the only species interested in concepts and ideas (as far as we know). In all the experiments with chimps and corvids, the reward was always food. As soon as a species creates or responds to art, then we can start applying a ‘theory of mind’ to that species and involving them in a discussion about their ‘rights’ if we want to take it that far.
  • We are human, therefore, we are only interested in what affects us. The extinction of a species only becomes of interest to the majority of us when we can’t eat it anymore, turn it into fancy clothes or view it in a zoo. Anthropomorphism is a natural thing to do. That’s why we like cute and cuddly panda’s and mosquitoes can go to hell.

From that premise I cannot see the problem with extending human rights to chimps (or any other species we care to adopt) should we wish to do so. The concept of rights is a social device and an attempt to raise human consciousness. It has nothing to do with genetic similarity but is a further application of the ‘golden rule’ of philosophy; do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Chimps look like us, they have highly individual faces - like us. It is easy to identify with them. Therefore in an attempt to raise our consciousness even further why not look to the species that most closely resembles our own and afford them our moral respect. Don’t forget, it was only a short while ago that the vast majority of people saw nothing wrong with the concept of slavery. Even today, you can find societies where one sector of the population actually believes that another is sub human and therefore fit for exploitation or extermination. To get people to recognise that we are brothers and sisters requires a change in perception, a new approach. I have no doubt that the abolitionists would have welcomed any idea, no matter how absurd, if it did the practical trick of enlightening people about the immorality of their position and released the slaves from their suffering.

As humans we have a disproportionate impact on the planet. Our consciousness is both a curse and a gift. If we evolve benignly then we will come to respect all life on the planet, realise the connectedness of all things and slowly gravitate towards vegetarianism and veganism. If we evolve malignantly (no more bets please) then we accept that there are no absolute truths, which means that we can dispense with morality and if we decide that the farming of children as a sustainable food source is acceptable -  then so be it.

That is our choice. It is the practical application of philosophy that matters now. If the anthropomorphism of chimps by a bunch of scientists leads to a higher state of consciousness for the rest of humanity then I say issue each chimp with a National Insurance number now because inevitably, other species will ultimately follow them and the intelligence of humanity will have paid off in an evolutionary sense.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google]